Where a person's only injuries resulting from the accident are threshold injuries, weekly benefits and treatment and care generally cease after 52 weeks (ss 3.11 and 3.28).
Social media posts and photos can influence NSW Compulsory Third Party (CTP) claims by providing evidence of a claimant's recovery progress. Under NSW law, digital content may be used to assess whether a person has returned to daily activities, but its admissibility depends on legal standards and relevance to the claim. This article explains how social media evidence is evaluated in CTP claims, focusing on its role in proving recovery of daily activities in regional areas like the Illawarra and South Coast.
How Social Media Evidence is Treated in CTP Claims
NSW CTP claims are governed by the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 and SIRA guidelines. Social media posts may be considered as evidence if they directly relate to a claimant's recovery, such as photos of daily tasks or posts indicating increased mobility. However, courts and SIRA assess such evidence based on its authenticity, relevance, and whether it meets the legal threshold for proving recovery.
For example, a claimant posting a video of themselves cooking might be used to demonstrate returning to household activities. However, the evidence must be verified as genuine and not misleading. SIRA’s guidelines emphasize that digital content should be evaluated alongside medical records and other clinical evidence to avoid overreliance on non-traditional sources.
Legal Standards for Proving Daily Activity Recovery
To claim compensation for recovery of daily activities, a claimant must demonstrate that their injuries have improved to the point where they can perform routine tasks. Social media evidence can support this, but it must align with medical assessments. SIRA requires that evidence of recovery be 'objective' and 'verifiable, ' meaning it should not rely solely on subjective online content.
A claimant’s ability to engage in daily activities is assessed using the 'return to daily activities' (RTDA) criteria outlined in SIRA’s Motor Accident Guidelines. Social media posts may be used to corroborate RTDA progress, but they cannot replace medical documentation. For instance, a claimant may need to show both a doctor’s note confirming mobility and a social media post of themselves walking to a local shop.
Practical Steps for Claimants in Illawarra and South Coast
Claimants in regional NSW should take specific steps to manage social media evidence:
- Document recovery milestones with photos or videos of daily tasks (e.g., cooking, shopping, exercise).
- Verify content authenticity by ensuring posts are not edited or misleading.
- Share evidence with SIRA as part of the claim process, but avoid overemphasizing online content.
- Consult a solicitor if social media evidence is challenged by the insurer.
SIRA’s regional offices in the Illawarra and South Coast may have specific procedures for handling digital evidence, so claimants should contact their local office for guidance.
Time Limits and Dispute Resolution
CTP claims must be submitted within 52 weeks of the accident, though extensions may apply for complex cases. Social media evidence must be submitted as part of the claim documentation during this period. If an insurer disputes the relevance of digital evidence, claimants can request a review by SIRA or seek legal advice to challenge the objection.
Claimants should also be aware that social media content can be misinterpreted. For example, a post about 'returning to work' may not reflect full recovery if the claimant is still receiving medical treatment. SIRA requires that all evidence, including social media, be evaluated in context with the claimant’s overall medical condition.
When to Seek Legal Advice
Social media evidence can be powerful but is often contested. Claimants should seek legal advice if:
- Their insurer rejects digital evidence as 'irrelevant' or 'unverifiable.'
- They face disputes over the interpretation of their online activity.
- They need to challenge an insurer’s refusal to consider social media as part of their claim.
A solicitor can help claimants understand their rights under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 and ensure that digital evidence is presented effectively.
Example of Social Media Evidence in Practice
Consider a claimant who posted a photo of themselves gardening on Instagram six weeks after an accident. While this could suggest recovery, SIRA would require additional evidence, such as a doctor’s note confirming the claimant’s ability to perform gardening tasks. If the claimant’s medical records show ongoing pain or mobility issues, the social media post alone may not be sufficient to prove full recovery.
Next Steps for Claimants
CTP claims involving social media evidence require careful management. Claimants should ensure all digital content is authentic, relevant, and supported by medical documentation. If they face disputes or need clarification on how to present evidence, they should contact SIRA’s regional offices or seek legal advice.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.