What the PIC expects in multi-vehicle pile-up disputes
Where a person's only injuries resulting from the accident are threshold injuries, weekly benefits and treatment and care generally cease after 52 weeks (ss 3.11 and 3.28).
When multiple vehicles are involved in a single crash, the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) evaluates claims based on the NSW CTP scheme. The PIC assesses disputes by considering factors like fault allocation, evidence of injury, and compliance with SIRA guidelines. In Bathurst or similar areas, claimants must demonstrate how their injuries relate to the accident and meet the scheme’s criteria for compensation.
NSW CTP rules for multi-vehicle accidents
The Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 governs claims under the NSW CTP scheme. For multi-vehicle pile-ups, the PIC determines liability by assessing which drivers’ actions contributed to the crash. Fault is not always apportioned equally, and the PIC may allocate responsibility based on evidence like police reports, witness statements, and vehicle damage assessments. If the accident involves more than one vehicle, the PIC will evaluate whether each driver’s actions fell within the ‘fault’ threshold under the scheme.
Evidence and practical steps for disputes
To support a claim in a multi-vehicle pile-up, claimants must provide:
- Accident reports from police or emergency services
- Witness statements from drivers or bystanders
- Medical records confirming injuries and their connection to the accident
- Photographs of the scene, vehicle damage, and any visible injuries
- Insurance documentation showing the PIC’s initial assessment
The PIC may request additional evidence if there are disputes about fault or injury severity. For example, if a claimant disputes the PIC’s allocation of responsibility, they must provide evidence that their injuries were caused by the specific driver’s actions.
Time limits and dispute resolution
Claims under the NSW CTP scheme must be submitted within 52 weeks of the accident, unless an extension is granted. If a dispute arises during this period, the PIC will review the claim based on the evidence provided. Claimants can request a review of the PIC’s decision by submitting a written objection within 28 days of receiving the notice. If the dispute involves medical evidence, the PIC may refer the case to a medical expert for further assessment.
When to seek legal advice
Complex disputes in multi-vehicle pile-ups often require legal assistance. A solicitor can help claimants understand their rights under the CTP scheme, challenge the PIC’s fault allocation, or dispute the assessment of injury severity. Legal advice is particularly useful if the claimant believes the PIC has misinterpreted the evidence or failed to consider relevant factors.
Example of a PIC dispute in a pile-up
Consider a scenario where three vehicles collide at a junction in Bathurst. Driver A swerves to avoid a pedestrian, causing a collision with Driver B’s car. Driver B’s car then strikes Driver C. The PIC may dispute whether Driver A’s actions constituted ‘fault’ under the scheme. If Driver A’s actions were not negligent, the PIC may deny compensation. However, if Driver A’s swerving was a direct cause of the accident, the PIC will assess whether the injuries suffered by Drivers B and C meet the scheme’s criteria for compensation.
Next steps for claimants
If you’re involved in a multi-vehicle pile-up and facing a dispute with the PIC, it’s essential to act promptly. Gather all relevant evidence, submit your claim within the 52-week deadline, and seek legal advice if the PIC’s decision is contested. Understanding the PIC’s expectations under the NSW CTP scheme can help you navigate the claims process more effectively.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.