Understanding the PIC’s Role in CTP Disputes in NSW
The Personal Injury Claims (PIC) process under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) governs CTP claims in New South Wales for motor accidents that occurred before 1 December 2017. This includes claims in Greater Sydney where the accident occurred prior to the introduction of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. The PIC is responsible for assessing and managing claims under this scheme, including handling disputes about entitlements, benefits and medical assessments. When a dispute arises, the PIC expects claimants and insurers to provide clear, accurate and timely evidence to support their position. The PIC’s approach is guided by the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, the Motor Accidents Compensation Regulation 1999, and the SIRA guidelines on claim management and dispute resolution.
What the PIC Expects During a Dispute
When a dispute arises under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, the PIC expects claimants and insurers to act in good faith and to comply with procedural requirements. The PIC will not accept incomplete, inconsistent or late submissions. Key expectations include:
- Providing a complete and contemporaneous record of injury and treatment from the time of the accident.
- Submitting medical evidence that clearly links the injury to the motor accident, including reports from treating medical practitioners and independent medical assessors.
- Responding promptly to requests for information, including medical reports, accident details and financial records.
- Notifying the PIC in writing of any changes to the claim, such as new injuries, changes in treatment or return to work.
The PIC may initiate a review if it believes a benefit or assessment is incorrect. This includes reviewing weekly income payments, treatment and care benefits, and the assessment of permanent impairment. The PIC will not proceed to a formal dispute resolution process without sufficient evidence to support a change in decision.
Practical Steps and Evidence That Matter
To meet the PIC’s expectations during a dispute, claimants and insurers should focus on gathering and preserving the following evidence:
- Medical records from the time of the accident through to current treatment, including diagnostic imaging, specialist assessments and rehabilitation progress notes.
- A detailed account of the accident, including the date, time, location, weather, road conditions and any witness statements.
- Photographs of the vehicle damage, scene of the accident, and visible injuries at the time of the incident.
- Records of lost income, including payslips, tax returns, and a letter from the employer confirming absence from work.
- Correspondence with the insurer, including written notifications of changes to the claim and responses to PIC requests.
The PIC places significant weight on medical evidence that demonstrates a causal link between the accident and the injury. Evidence must show that the injury was not pre-existing and that it has resulted in a measurable impact on the claimant’s capacity to work, perform daily activities, or maintain their usual lifestyle.
Dispute Resolution and Review Pathways
If a claimant disagrees with a PIC decision, they may request a review. The review must be initiated within 28 days of receiving the decision, or within 60 days if the claimant was not informed of the right to review. The review is conducted by a different PIC officer to ensure impartiality.
If the review does not resolve the dispute, the claimant may apply to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) for a formal review of the medical assessment. This pathway is available for disputes about permanent impairment, treatment needs, or the assessment of capacity to work. The Commission may require a new independent medical assessment and will consider all available evidence before making a determination.
The Commission will only overturn a decision if it finds that the original assessment was incorrect or based on insufficient evidence. The process can take several months, and claimants should not assume that a review will result in a higher benefit or a different medical assessment.
Time Limits and When to Seek Advice
Time limits apply to dispute resolution under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999. A claimant must apply for a review within 28 days of receiving the decision, or within 60 days if they were not given notice of the right to review. Failure to meet these deadlines may result in the claim being closed or the dispute being dismissed.
The PIC expects claimants to act promptly and to keep records of all communications. If a claimant is unsure about the process or the evidence required, they should seek independent advice before the review deadline. The SIRA website provides guidance on making a claim and managing disputes, but it does not replace legal or medical advice.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.