A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
Medical assessment disputes are a common issue in NSW Compulsory Third Party (CTP) motor accident claims. These disputes often arise when claimants and insurers disagree on the extent of injuries, treatment needs, or long-term impacts. This article explains how such disputes are resolved under NSW law, focusing on practical examples from the Central Coast. It outlines the role of the Personal Injury Commission (PIC), how SIRA handles disagreements, and steps claimants can take to navigate these situations.
How Medical Assessment Disputes Arise
Disputes typically occur when a medical report submitted by a treating practitioner conflicts with an insurer’s assessment. For example, a claimant may argue their injury meets the threshold for long-term benefits, while the insurer disputes this. Under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, medical assessments must be based on clinical evidence, and disagreements often hinge on whether the injury meets the 'threshold injury' definition in the Motor Accident Guidelines. On the Central Coast, claimants have reported disputes over spinal nerve-root injuries, where the presence of neurological signs without radiculopathy can lead to conflicting interpretations.
The Role of the PIC in Resolving Disputes
The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) oversees medical assessments under the CTP scheme. When a dispute arises, the PIC may request an independent medical opinion from a registered medical practitioner. This process ensures assessments are based on objective clinical criteria. For instance, if a claimant disputes a report stating their injury does not meet the threshold, the PIC will evaluate whether the medical evidence supports a different conclusion. The PIC’s decisions are binding, and claimants must comply with their recommendations to proceed with benefits or further assessments.
SIRA’s Process for Handling Disagreements
SIRA (State Insurance Regulatory Authority) manages claims under the CTP scheme. If a dispute over a medical assessment persists, SIRA may initiate an internal review. This process involves reviewing all medical records, accident reports, and correspondence. Claimants are entitled to submit additional evidence, such as second opinions or updated treatment records. On the Central Coast, SIRA has clarified that disputes must be resolved through the PIC’s medical review pathway before escalating to formal dispute resolution. This ensures consistency in applying the Motor Accident Guidelines across all claims.
Practical Steps for Claimants
- Document the Dispute: Keep copies of all medical reports, correspondence with insurers, and records of treatment. For example, if a claimant receives a report stating their injury does not meet the threshold, they should note discrepancies in the report’s reasoning.
- Seek Independent Medical Advice: Obtain a second opinion from a registered medical practitioner. This can help clarify whether the injury meets the threshold or requires further assessment.
- Engage with the PIC: If the PIC requests an independent assessment, cooperate fully. Failure to comply may delay benefits or result in a decision being made without all evidence.
- Review Time Limits: Under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, claimants must submit medical assessments within 52 weeks of the accident if they seek long-term benefits. Delays can jeopardize eligibility for weekly payments or treatment costs.
- Challenge the Decision: If the PIC’s decision is unsatisfactory, claimants can request a review by SIRA. This process may take several months, so it’s important to act promptly.
Example: A Central Coast Claimant’s Experience
A claimant on the Central Coast disputed a medical report that downgraded their injury from a threshold injury to a minor soft-tissue injury. The report failed to account for persistent neurological symptoms documented in their treatment records. After submitting additional evidence to the PIC, an independent assessment confirmed the injury met the threshold. This example highlights the importance of thorough documentation and engaging with the PIC’s review process.
When to Seek Legal Advice
While SIRA and the PIC handle most disputes, complex cases may require legal assistance. A solicitor can help claimants understand their rights, challenge decisions, or negotiate with insurers. Legal advice is particularly valuable when disputes involve long-term impairment, lifetime care needs, or overlaps with workers’ compensation claims. However, legal representation is not mandatory for all disputes, and many claimants resolve issues through the PIC’s process alone.
Next Steps for Claimants
If you are facing a medical assessment dispute on the Central Coast, the first step is to gather all relevant evidence and submit it to the PIC. Time limits are strict, so acting promptly is crucial. If the dispute persists, seek guidance from SIRA or a legal professional. Remember, every claim depends on its own facts, and the outcome will depend on the strength of your evidence and compliance with procedural requirements.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.