Understanding Medical Assessment Disputes in NSW CTP Claims
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
If you have been injured in a motor accident in regional New South Wales and disagree with a medical assessment conducted under the Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance scheme, you may need to take early steps to challenge the outcome. These disputes often arise when an insurer or the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) determines that your injuries do not meet the threshold for damages, or when the level of impairment assigned does not reflect your ongoing symptoms. The Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA) governs CTP claims in NSW, and it provides a structured process for addressing medical assessment disputes. Early action is critical, particularly in regional areas where access to medical specialists and legal advice may be limited.
Key Early Steps to Resolve a Medical Assessment Dispute
The first practical step is to obtain a copy of the medical report that forms the basis of the assessment. This document will detail the findings, the assessment method used, and the conclusion reached. If you believe the assessment is incorrect or incomplete, you should request a review from the insurer or, if necessary, apply to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) for a formal review.
Under the MAIA, you may request a review of a medical assessment decision if you believe it is flawed or based on insufficient evidence. This review can be initiated through the PIC’s dispute resolution process. The PIC has a statutory role in assessing medical evidence and resolving disputes, including those involving whole person impairment (WPI) and threshold injury determinations.
If you are dissatisfied with the outcome of the review, you may request a formal assessment by an independent medical expert. This step is available under the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 and must be supported by new medical evidence that was not considered in the original assessment.
Evidence That Matters in a Medical Dispute
To successfully challenge a medical assessment, you must provide evidence that supports your claim of ongoing injury. The most important evidence includes:
- A detailed medical record from your treating practitioner, including notes on symptoms, treatment progress, and functional limitations.
- A report from a specialist, such as a neurologist, orthopaedic surgeon, or pain management physician, that confirms the nature and extent of your injury.
- Documentation of any ongoing treatment, including physiotherapy, medication, or psychological support.
- Evidence of how your injury affects your daily life, such as inability to work, perform household tasks, or participate in social activities.
The Motor Accident Guidelines require that assessments consider objective clinical signs, not just patient-reported symptoms. For example, a spinal nerve-root injury that causes neurological signs such as muscle weakness, sensory changes, or reflex abnormalities may still qualify as a threshold injury even if radiculopathy (a type of nerve root pain) is not present. However, radiculopathy must be confirmed by clinical signs such as altered reflexes or sensory loss to be recognised under the guidelines.
Navigating Regional Challenges in Dispute Resolution
In regional NSW, access to specialist medical practitioners and legal advisors can be limited. This may delay the gathering of supporting evidence or the submission of a dispute. It is important to act early to allow time for medical appointments, second opinions, and formal submissions to the PIC.
The PIC has a process for handling disputes and provides information on how to submit a review request. You can apply online through the SIRA website or by post. The PIC will assess whether the original assessment was made in accordance with the law and the Motor Accident Guidelines. If the PIC finds that the assessment was not properly conducted, it may order a new assessment or adjust the WPI rating.
It is also possible to seek assistance from a community legal centre or a regional legal aid service, which may provide advice on how to proceed. However, these services are not a substitute for independent legal advice, particularly when a damages claim is being considered.
Time Limits and Procedural Requirements
There are time limits for challenging a medical assessment. You must apply to the PIC for a review within 28 days of receiving the decision. If you miss this deadline, you may still apply, but the PIC has discretion to accept or refuse late applications. The longer you wait, the more difficult it becomes to obtain new medical evidence, as records may be lost or treatment may have been discontinued.
A formal dispute does not automatically change the original assessment. The PIC will review the evidence and may uphold, vary, or overturn the decision. If the PIC upholds the original assessment, you may still seek a review by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT), but only if you have exhausted all internal review options and have a valid reason to challenge the decision.
When to Seek Independent Advice
A medical assessment dispute is not a simple administrative process. The outcome can affect your entitlement to weekly income payments, treatment and care benefits, and potentially a damages claim. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to seek independent legal advice before submitting a review request or formal challenge.
Legal advice can help you understand whether your injury meets the threshold for damages under MAIA, whether the assessment was conducted properly, and what evidence is most persuasive. It can also help you navigate the PIC’s internal review process, which has strict procedural rules.
For example, if you were injured in a car crash in Wagga Wagga in July 2024 and were assessed as having a WPI of 5%, but you continue to experience chronic back pain and cannot return to full-time work, you may have grounds to dispute the assessment. A specialist report confirming a disc injury with neurological signs not previously documented could be critical to a successful challenge.
Next Steps
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.