Legal Advice

MAI Act Transitional Claims: What Claimants Need to Know About PIC Expectations in Albury NSW

This article explains how insurers must handle transitional claims under the MAI Act in NSW, focusing on what claimants (PICs) can expect during disputes. It outlines the legal expectations, practical steps for resolving conflicts, and how SIRA guidelines apply to transitional claims in Albury. Time limits and procedural requirements may apply. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.

Current as at 15 October 2026

Transitional Claims Under the MAI Act

A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).

If you've been injured in a motor accident in NSW and your claim spans before and after 1 January 2017, you may be dealing with a transitional claim under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAI Act). These claims are unique because they involve both the old and new CTP compensation rules. The PIC (Personal Injury Commission) has specific expectations for how insurers must handle these disputes, and understanding these is critical to securing fair treatment.

The MAI Act introduced significant changes to how injuries are assessed, including new thresholds for what qualifies as a 'threshold injury' and revised rules for long-term benefits. Transitional claims must be evaluated under both the previous CTP scheme and the new MAI Act framework. This means insurers must apply the correct legal standards to each part of your claim, depending on when the injury occurred.

What PIC Expectations Mean for You

When disputes arise over transitional claims, the PIC expects insurers to:

  • Apply the correct legal standards to each part of the claim based on the injury date
  • Provide clear reasoning for decisions affecting both pre- and post-2017 injuries
  • Allow for internal review of decisions before escalating to external dispute resolution
  • Comply with SIRA's guidelines on transitional claims

Insurers must also ensure that claimants are not disadvantaged by the transition. For example, if your claim includes both a pre-2017 injury and a post-2017 injury, the PIC requires insurers to apply the appropriate benefit calculations to each injury separately.

Practical Steps for Transitional Claim Disputes

If you're facing a dispute over your transitional claim, take these steps:

  • Request a written explanation of the insurer's decision
  • Ask for the specific legal provisions applied to each part of your claim
  • Seek clarification on how the injury dates affect benefit calculations
  • Request an internal review before escalating the matter

Document all correspondence and keep copies of all medical records, accident reports, and insurer communications. The PIC requires insurers to provide claimants with access to the full range of evidence supporting their decisions.

How SIRA Guidelines Apply to Transitional Claims

SIRA's guidelines on transitional claims emphasize that insurers must:

  • Apply the correct legal standards to each injury based on its date
  • Avoid double-counting benefits for overlapping injuries
  • Provide claimants with the opportunity to challenge decisions through internal review
  • Comply with the 52-week statutory benefit rules for threshold injuries

When disputes arise, SIRA advises claimants to:

  • Request a detailed breakdown of how benefits were calculated
  • Challenge decisions that appear to apply the wrong legal standard
  • Seek independent medical opinions if needed

A Hypothetical Example

Imagine you were injured in a car accident on 15 December 2016 (pre-2017 CTP rules) and suffered a second injury on 1 January 2018 (post-2017 MAI Act). Your insurer may have denied benefits for the second injury, claiming it's a 'threshold injury' under the new rules. However, the PIC requires insurers to apply the pre-2017 rules to the first injury and the MAI Act rules to the second. If the insurer fails to apply the correct standards, you may have grounds to challenge their decision.

When to Seek Legal Advice

Transitional claims are complex because they involve two different legal frameworks. If your insurer refuses to apply the correct standards, disputes your claim, or fails to provide a clear explanation, you should seek legal advice. A solicitor can help you:

  • Challenge decisions that appear to apply the wrong legal standard
  • Request internal reviews or external dispute resolution
  • Navigate the PIC's medical dispute pathway
  • Ensure your claim is assessed under the correct legal framework

Next Steps

Understanding what the PIC expects from insurers during transitional claim disputes is essential to protecting your rights. If you're in Albury NSW and facing a claim dispute, take the time to review the insurer's decision carefully. If you're unsure how to proceed, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form to request contact about your circumstances.

Prepared using automated research and drafting tools and checked through LegalAdvice editorial and source-validation controls. This page is general information, not personalised legal advice.

The information contained in this website is not intended to constitute professional legal advice. You acknowledge that legaladvice.com.au does not provide legal services or legal advice and that you should not rely or act upon any information received from the use of the website.

How LegalAdvice creates and checks content