Legal Advice

MAI Act Transitional Claims in NSW: Answers to Common Questions from Injured People in Greater Sydney

Injured people in Greater Sydney with motor accidents before 1 December 2017 may face transitional claims under the MAI Act. These claims follow different rules than standard CTP claims, with time limits, eligibility for damages, and evidence requirements that depend on the accident date and claim history. Understanding the distinction between old and new law is essential to protect your rights.

Current as at 31 October 2026

Understanding MAI Act Transitional Claims in NSW

If you were injured in a motor accident in Greater Sydney before 1 December 2017, but have ongoing treatment, symptoms, or a claim that continues into 2026, you may be dealing with a transitional claim under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA). These claims arise when an accident occurred under the old Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (MACA) framework, but the injury, treatment, or claim process extends into the new MAIA system. The legal framework for these claims is not the same as for accidents that occurred entirely under the new law. The distinction matters because entitlements, time limits, and assessment processes differ.

How Transitional Claims Differ from Standard CTP Claims

Transitional claims are not governed by the same rules as claims that began entirely under the MAIA. The key difference lies in the legal framework that applies to the injury and the claim process. For accidents occurring before 1 December 2017, the original MACA rules apply to the injury and the claim’s initial stages. However, if the claim continues beyond that date, or if treatment, assessment, or a damages claim is pursued under the new law, the MAIA may apply to those later stages.

The Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 introduced a new threshold for claiming damages: a person must have a 'threshold injury' to pursue a damages claim. This includes injuries such as a permanent impairment of 10% or more, or a 'soft tissue injury' with specified neurological signs. For transitional claims, the threshold test may still apply if a damages claim is made, but the injury must be assessed under the MAIA’s criteria, not the old MACA standards.

Key Time Limits for Transitional Claims

Time limits for transitional claims are not uniform and depend on when the injury occurred, when treatment began, and when the claim was formally made. The general rule is that claims must be made within three years of the accident date. However, for claims that began under MACA but continue under MAIA, the three-year limit still applies to the original claim.

If you have not yet made a claim, you must do so within three years of the motor accident. This deadline is strict and does not extend simply because treatment continues. For example, if you were injured on 15 March 2016, you must have made your claim by 15 March 2019, regardless of ongoing symptoms or treatment.

If you have already made a claim under MACA, but it remains unresolved, you may still be able to seek a review or update your claim under the MAIA framework. However, any new claim for damages must still meet the threshold injury test and be filed within the three-year limit.

What You Can Claim Under a Transitional Claim

Under a transitional claim, you may be entitled to:

  • Treatment and care benefits for injuries sustained in the accident, including medical treatment, rehabilitation, and allied health services.
  • Weekly income payments if you are unable to work due to the injury, and your incapacity is supported by medical evidence.
  • Damages for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and future care needs, but only if you meet the threshold injury test under the MAIA.

The assessment of damages for transitional claims follows the MAIA’s guidelines, including the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 and the Motor Accident Guidelines. These set out how impairment is calculated and what evidence is required. For example, a spinal nerve-root injury that causes neurological signs such as muscle weakness or sensory changes may qualify as a threshold injury, even if it does not involve radiculopathy.

Common Mistakes in Transitional Claims

Injured people often make several errors that can delay or reduce their entitlements:

  • Assuming that the MAIA applies to all aspects of a pre-2017 accident. The old MACA rules still apply to the initial claim and injury assessment unless a new claim is formally made.
  • Delaying the formal claim until after the three-year deadline because treatment continues. This can result in a permanent bar to compensation.
  • Failing to obtain a formal impairment assessment from a qualified medical practitioner, which is required to claim damages under the MAIA.
  • Not keeping a complete record of medical treatment, income loss, and accident details, which are essential for proving entitlements.

Evidence That Matters in Transitional Claims

The following evidence is typically required to support a transitional claim:

  • Medical records from the time of the accident and any subsequent treatment, including reports from your treating medical practitioner and any specialist assessments.
  • A formal whole person impairment (WPI) assessment conducted under the MAIA’s guidelines, if seeking damages.
  • Evidence of income loss, such as a letter from your employer, payslips, or tax returns.
  • Photographs of the accident scene, vehicle damage, or injuries, if available.
  • Witness statements, if there were witnesses to the accident.
  • A copy of the accident report, if one was filed with the police or SIRA.

Disputes and Review Options

If your claim is denied or you disagree with the insurer’s assessment, you may request a review. SIRA provides a formal review process for decisions made under the MAIA. You can apply for a review within 28 days of receiving a decision. If the review does not resolve the dispute, you may apply to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) for a determination.

For transitional claims, the review process may involve a review of the original MACA claim and how it interacts with the MAIA framework. It is important to clearly identify which parts of the claim are governed by which law.

When to Seek Independent Advice

Transitional claims are complex because they straddle two legal regimes. The interaction between MACA and MAIA rules, time limits, and assessment standards can be difficult to navigate without legal guidance. If you have not yet made a claim, or if your claim has been denied, it is advisable to seek independent advice before taking further steps.

Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.

Prepared using automated research and drafting tools and checked through LegalAdvice editorial and source-validation controls. This page is general information, not personalised legal advice.

The information contained in this website is not intended to constitute professional legal advice. You acknowledge that legaladvice.com.au does not provide legal services or legal advice and that you should not rely or act upon any information received from the use of the website.

How LegalAdvice creates and checks content