A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
If you're involved in a motor accident claim that spans the 2017 CTP law changes, resolving disputes under the Motor Accident Injuries (MAI) Act requires understanding the specific pathways available. This article explains how claimants in Western Sydney can address disagreements over transitional claims, including SIRA's role and legal steps under NSW CTP law.
NSW CTP Rules for Transitional Claims
The MAI Act applies to claims arising from motor accidents occurring on or after 1 January 2018. Transitional claims, those involving injuries from before this date, require a hybrid approach, combining elements of the old CTP scheme with the new MAI Act. Key considerations include:
- Eligibility: Claims must involve injuries occurring on or after 1 January 2018, with some pre-2018 injuries qualifying if they meet the 'threshold injury' criteria under the MAI Act.
- Benefits: Transitional claims may access both pre-2018 statutory benefits (like weekly payments) and post-2017 damages claims, depending on the injury's severity and timing.
- SIRA's role: The State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) administers claims under the MAI Act, including disputes over transitional claims. SIRA evaluates whether injuries meet the new 'whole person impairment' or 'threshold injury' thresholds.
Dispute Resolution Options
Disputes over transitional claims can arise from disagreements about injury severity, benefit eligibility, or the application of pre- and post-2017 rules. Available resolution methods include:
- Internal review: SIRA allows claimants to request a review of their claim's assessment. This process involves submitting new evidence or clarifying medical reports.
- Mediation: SIRA offers mediation services to resolve disputes without litigation. Mediators help parties negotiate terms, such as the scope of benefits or the need for further medical assessments.
- Legal action: If disputes cannot be resolved through SIRA channels, claimants may pursue a court application. This is typically a last resort and requires legal representation to challenge SIRA's decision.
Key Legal Steps for Disputes
To resolve transitional claim disputes effectively, claimants should:
- Document evidence: Gather all medical records, accident reports, and correspondence with SIRA. Evidence must clearly link the injury to the accident and demonstrate how it meets the MAI Act's criteria.
- Request internal review: Submit a formal written request to SIRA for a review of the claim's assessment. Include any new evidence or clarification of existing records.
- Seek legal advice: A solicitor can help challenge SIRA's decision, especially if the claim involves complex issues like contributory fault or overlapping benefits.
Practical Considerations
- Time limits: Transitional claims must be resolved within the statutory timeframes for the MAI Act. For example, weekly benefits are generally limited to 52 weeks if only threshold injuries are involved (s 4.4 of the MAI Act).
- Medical evidence: SIRA relies heavily on medical assessments to determine injury severity. Independent medical opinions may be required to challenge an initial assessment.
- Location-specific support: In Western Sydney, SIRA offices provide local assistance. Claimants should contact the nearest SIRA office for guidance on dispute resolution processes.
Example Scenario
Consider a claimant injured in a 2016 accident who develops a threshold injury in 2018. SIRA may dispute whether the injury qualifies under the MAI Act. The claimant could request an internal review, submit updated medical records, and seek mediation to resolve the disagreement.
When to Seek Advice
Disputes over transitional claims can be complex, especially when they involve both pre- and post-2017 rules. Legal advice is essential if:
- SIRA denies a claim or limits benefits.
- The claimant believes the injury meets the MAI Act's criteria.
- There are disputes over the application of the 52-week limit for weekly benefits.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.