What Changed for Intersection Accident Claims in NSW After 2017?
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
The 2017 reforms to NSW’s Compulsory Third Party (CTP) scheme introduced significant changes to how claims are assessed, particularly for intersection accidents. These reforms shifted from a strict no-fault system to a more nuanced approach where fault and injury severity now influence compensation. For example, if a driver and pedestrian both contributed to an accident at an intersection in Balmain, the claimant’s entitlements may depend on how fault is apportioned under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.
Key Legal Changes to CTP Claims After 2017
The reforms introduced three major shifts:
- Fault-based liability: While CTP still covers injuries regardless of fault, the 2017 changes allow for reduced compensation if the claimant contributed to the accident. This applies to intersection collisions where both parties may share responsibility.
- Threshold injury rules: Injuries must meet specific criteria to qualify for benefits. For instance, a soft-tissue injury must involve a spinal nerve-root injury with neurological signs, not just general pain. This affects claims where injuries are minor but occur at an intersection.
- 52-week benefit cap: If a claimant’s only injuries are threshold injuries, weekly benefits and treatment payments stop after 52 weeks. This applies even if the injury occurred at an intersection and requires ongoing care.
Practical Steps and Evidence for Intersection Claims
To support a CTP claim after an intersection accident:
- Document fault: Gather evidence like traffic camera footage, witness statements, or police reports to establish how the accident occurred. For example, if a driver ran a red light and a pedestrian jaywalked, both parties’ actions must be assessed.
- Medical records: Ensure medical professionals document injuries using the Motor Accident Guidelines. This is critical for proving whether an injury meets the threshold for benefits.
- Accident details: Preserve evidence of the intersection’s layout, traffic signals, and any road signs. This helps assess whether the accident was caused by a failure to yield or other contributory factors.
Time Limits and Dispute Resolution
CTP claims must be submitted within 52 weeks of the accident, unless an extension is granted. Delays can jeopardize entitlements, especially if the injury is a threshold injury. If a claim is disputed, the claimant may need to:
- Request a review from the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA).
- Seek independent medical opinions to support the injury’s severity.
- Consider mediation or legal advice if the insurer rejects the claim.
Example: How the 2017 Reforms Affect a Balmain Intersection Claim
Imagine a pedestrian in Balmain was hit at a red light-controlled intersection. The driver claimed they were also jaywalking. Under the 2017 reforms, the claimant’s compensation would depend on:
- Whether the pedestrian’s injury meets the threshold injury criteria (e.g., spinal nerve-root injury with neurological signs).
- How fault is apportioned between the driver and pedestrian.
- Whether the injury is a threshold injury, which would trigger the 52-week benefit cap.
When to Seek Legal Advice
If the accident involved complex fault, unclear injury severity, or disputes over benefits, it’s wise to consult a solicitor. Legal advice can help navigate SIRA’s guidelines and ensure all evidence is properly submitted.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.