A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
If you're involved in a NSW motor accident claim and your insurer disputes your treatment or rehabilitation plan, understanding the internal review process is critical. This article explains how insurers assess medical planning for CTP claims, the role of SIRA in resolving disputes, and what evidence matters in Ashfield. It also outlines time limits and when to seek independent legal advice.
Understanding the Internal Review Process
NSW insurers must review treatment and rehabilitation plans for CTP claims before making decisions about benefits. This process involves assessing whether the proposed plan aligns with the injury's severity and medical guidelines. Insurers typically request documentation such as medical reports, treatment schedules, and evidence of how the plan addresses your specific needs.
When an insurer disputes a claimant's plan, they may request a reconsideration. This internal review is not a formal dispute resolution step but a prerequisite before escalating to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) or SIRA. Claimants should note that insurers must provide a written explanation for any adverse decision, including reasons why the treatment plan does not meet their criteria.
SIRA's Role in Disputes
If an insurer's internal review leads to a disputed decision, claimants can escalate the matter to SIRA. SIRA oversees the resolution of conflicts between insurers and claimants, ensuring decisions comply with the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. In Ashfield, claimants should contact SIRA directly to initiate a review of the insurer's decision.
SIRA's role includes assessing whether the insurer applied the correct legal standards when evaluating the treatment plan. For example, if an insurer rejects a claimant's plan without considering the spinal nerve-root qualification under the Motor Accident Guidelines, SIRA may intervene. Claimants should request a written explanation of the insurer's decision to identify potential errors.
Key Documentation and Evidence
To support your rehabilitation plan, gather evidence that demonstrates the plan's alignment with your injury and medical needs. Essential documents include:
- Medical records confirming the injury's severity and treatment requirements
- Detailed treatment schedules with timelines and goals
- Evidence of how the plan addresses both physical and functional impairments
- Any correspondence with the insurer regarding the plan's approval
Insurers often dispute claims by arguing the plan is too ambitious or lacks clinical justification. For example, if a claimant's plan includes physiotherapy for a soft-tissue injury but the insurer argues it's not 'threshold injury' under the Motor Accident Guidelines, you must provide evidence supporting the injury's classification.
Time Limits and When to Seek Advice
Insurers must respond to claims within specific timeframes. If an insurer rejects your treatment plan without a valid reason, you may have limited time to challenge the decision. For instance, if the insurer's internal review takes longer than 28 days, you may have grounds to request an expedited review.
Seek legal advice if the insurer's decision appears to ignore key legal principles, such as the 52-week statutory benefit limit for threshold injuries. While SIRA handles disputes, a solicitor can help you prepare a stronger case by identifying gaps in the insurer's reasoning.
Practical Example
Consider a claimant in Ashfield who sustained a soft-tissue injury and submitted a rehabilitation plan including physiotherapy and occupational therapy. The insurer disputes the plan, arguing it's not 'threshold injury' under the Motor Accident Guidelines. The claimant must provide medical evidence confirming the injury meets the spinal nerve-root qualification. If the insurer ignores this, SIRA may intervene to ensure the claimant receives fair treatment planning.
Next Steps
CTP claims involving treatment planning require careful documentation and timely action. If your insurer disputes your plan, request a written explanation and consider escalating to SIRA. For complex disputes, consult a solicitor to ensure your rights under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 are protected.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.