Understanding Insurer Internal Reviews in NSW CTP Claims
If your motor accident claim in Bankstown has been disputed by your insurer, you may be asked to undergo an internal review. This process allows the insurer to reconsider their initial decision on your claim, particularly regarding injury assessment and entitlement to benefits. The review is not a formal tribunal process, but it is a critical step before escalating to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) or the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA). Understanding what documentation is required during this review can significantly affect the outcome.
What Documentation Is Required for Injury Claims During Internal Reviews
Insurers assess injury claims using the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 and the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017. When a claim is disputed, the insurer must base their decision on medical evidence and the SIRA guidelines for injury assessment. The following documentation is typically required to support your claim during an internal review:
- A detailed medical report from your treating medical practitioner, including diagnosis, treatment plan, and prognosis.
- Evidence of how the accident caused or worsened your injury, such as a history of pre-existing conditions.
- Records of all medical treatment received since the accident, including appointments, imaging results (e.g. MRI, X-ray), and therapy notes.
- A statement from a witness to the accident, if available, confirming the nature and impact of the incident.
- Photographic evidence of any vehicle damage or scene conditions, if relevant.
- Proof of lost income or reduced capacity to work, such as a letter from your employer or a payroll summary.
Insurers must follow the SIRA Motor Accident Guidelines when evaluating whether injuries meet the threshold for damages. For example, a soft tissue injury may still qualify as a threshold injury if it results in a spinal nerve-root injury with neurological signs other than radiculopathy.
How Insurers Assess Disputes in CTP Claims Using SIRA Guidelines
Insurers are required to assess disputes in CTP claims using the SIRA guidelines, which set out the criteria for injury classification and benefit entitlement. The guidelines define what constitutes a threshold injury, including injuries that result in a permanent impairment of at least 10% to the whole person, or injuries that result in a permanent loss of function.
When reviewing a claim, insurers must consider:
- Whether the injury was caused by the motor accident.
- Whether the injury meets the threshold for damages under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.
- Whether the injury is a result of a pre-existing condition, and if so, whether the accident aggravated it.
- Whether the claimant has received treatment for the injury within a reasonable timeframe.
An insurer may dispute a claim if they believe the injury does not meet the threshold, or if they consider the treatment provided was not reasonable or necessary. However, they must provide a written explanation for any decision to deny or reduce benefits.
Practical Steps to Take During an Internal Review
If your claim has been disputed and you are required to undergo an internal review, take the following steps to strengthen your position:
- Gather all medical records, treatment notes, and correspondence with your insurer.
- Request a copy of the insurer’s internal review policy and timeline, if not already provided.
- Submit a written response to the insurer within the timeframe specified, outlining why you believe the decision should be reconsidered.
- Include any new evidence, such as a second medical opinion, a workplace statement, or updated imaging.
- Keep a record of all communications with the insurer, including dates, times, and names of staff.
Insurers are not required to accept new evidence unless it was not previously available. However, a well-documented submission increases the likelihood of a favourable outcome.
Time Limits and Dispute Pathways After Internal Review
There is no fixed statutory deadline for an internal review, but insurers are expected to complete the process within a reasonable timeframe, typically 28 to 60 days from the date of your request. If you do not receive a response within 60 days, you may proceed to the next step: a formal dispute with the Personal Injury Commission (PIC).
If the insurer upholds their original decision, you may apply to the PIC to review the matter. The PIC will assess whether the insurer’s decision was reasonable under the law and the evidence. You may also request a medical assessment through the PIC, which can be critical if the insurer disputes the nature or severity of your injury.
In cases where the injury is disputed and the insurer refuses to pay for treatment, you may apply to the PIC for a determination on treatment and care benefits. The PIC has the authority to order the insurer to provide treatment, including rehabilitation, psychological support, or home modifications.
When to Seek Independent Legal Advice
An internal review is not a substitute for legal advice. If your injury is complex, if you have a pre-existing condition, or if the insurer has refused to pay for treatment, you should seek independent advice before finalising your submission. A solicitor can help you:
- Interpret the SIRA guidelines and assess whether your injury meets the threshold.
- Identify gaps in your medical evidence.
- Prepare a submission that clearly outlines why the insurer’s decision should be overturned.
For example, a claimant in Bankstown who sustained a whiplash injury after a rear-end collision may have a valid claim if medical imaging shows a spinal nerve-root injury with neurological signs, even if radiculopathy is not present. In such a case, a second medical opinion may be essential to demonstrate that the injury meets the threshold under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.
Next Steps: What You Should Do Now
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.