Understanding Insurer Internal Reviews in NSW CTP Claims
When an insurer denies or limits a claim for motor accident compensation in New South Wales, the claimant may request an internal review. This process allows the insurer to reconsider its decision based on new or additional information. For claimants who are caregivers or whose injury has significantly affected family members, internal reviews provide a formal opportunity to present evidence of how the injury has disrupted caregiving roles, family dynamics, and household responsibilities. The Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA) and SIRA’s guidance confirm that insurers must assess claims fairly and in accordance with the law, including the impact on dependants and family members who provide care.
How Insurers Assess Caregiver and Family Impacts During Internal Reviews
Insurers in NSW must consider the full impact of an injury on a claimant’s ability to perform caregiving duties, including care for children, elderly relatives, or dependants with disabilities. Under the MAIA, a claimant may be entitled to treatment and care benefits, weekly income payments, and damages for non-economic loss, including loss of companionship and care. During an internal review, insurers are expected to review medical evidence, statements from family members, and documentation of changes in household responsibilities. SIRA’s guidance states that a claimant’s capacity to provide care is a relevant factor in determining the extent of impairment and the need for ongoing support.
The review process does not require a new medical assessment unless new clinical evidence is submitted. However, a detailed statement from a family member describing changes in daily routines, emotional strain, or increased burden on another caregiver may strengthen the claim. Insurers are not required to accept a family member’s statement as conclusive, but they must give it proper consideration as part of the review.
Evidence That Supports Family and Caregiver Claims in Internal Reviews
To support a claim involving caregiver or family impact, the following evidence is typically required:
- A written statement from a family member detailing changes in care responsibilities, emotional or physical strain, and any financial or time costs.
- Medical records that confirm the claimant’s injury and its effect on their ability to perform daily tasks or care for dependants.
- A report from a treating medical practitioner or psychologist that outlines functional limitations, including the inability to assist with child care, household management, or personal care.
- Documentation of any increase in out-of-pocket expenses related to care, such as hiring help or purchasing assistive devices.
- A diary or log of daily activities showing a reduction in time available for family duties.
SIRA’s guidance confirms that family impact is not limited to physical care. Emotional and psychological effects, such as increased anxiety, depression, or family conflict, may also be considered if supported by clinical evidence.
Time Limits and Procedural Requirements for Internal Reviews
A claimant must request an internal review within 28 days of receiving a decision that denies or limits benefits. This deadline is strict and must be met to preserve the right to escalate the matter to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) or the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA). The insurer must respond to the internal review request within 28 days. If the insurer upholds its original decision, the claimant may then apply to the PIC for a review.
The insurer is legally bound to make a decision based on the law and evidence, not on a desire to resolve the dispute. A claimant who believes the insurer has failed to properly consider family or caregiving factors may seek independent legal advice before proceeding to the PIC.
When to Seek Independent Advice
Internal reviews are not a substitute for legal advice. While insurers must follow the MAIA and SIRA’s Motor Accident Guidelines, they are not required to grant a claim based on family impact alone. The law does not automatically entitle a claimant to higher benefits because a family member has taken on additional care duties. The entitlement depends on whether the injury has caused a measurable loss of function, and whether that loss has affected the claimant’s capacity to provide care.
A claimant who has experienced a significant change in family roles, such as a parent unable to care for a child with a disability, or a spouse who has taken on full responsibility for household management, may benefit from legal advice to determine whether the evidence supports a claim for damages or additional treatment and care benefits.
Hypothetical Example: Family Impact in a Caregiver’s Claim
A 42-year-old mother was injured in a motor accident while driving her two children to school. She sustained a soft tissue injury to her neck and back, which caused chronic pain and reduced mobility. Prior to the accident, she managed her 10-year-old son’s autism-related care, including school coordination, therapy appointments, and daily routines. After the accident, she was unable to perform these tasks. Her husband, who previously shared care duties, took on full responsibility, resulting in a 20-hour weekly increase in his work hours and a decline in his mental health.
She submitted a statement from her husband, medical reports confirming her functional limitations, and a log of missed appointments and family disruptions. The insurer initially denied her claim for damages on the basis that her injury was not a threshold injury. She requested an internal review, which included a review of her family impact evidence. The insurer reconsidered and agreed to pay for treatment and care benefits, but maintained the damages denial. She then applied to the PIC for a review of the damages decision.
Next Steps and Seeking Contact
Every claim depends on its own facts. The impact of an injury on family and caregiving roles may influence an insurer’s internal review, but it does not guarantee a change in decision. The legal framework under the MAIA and SIRA’s guidelines provides a structure for assessing these factors, but outcomes depend on the strength and nature of the evidence.
To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.