What Changed About Insurer Internal Reviews After 2017?
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
The 2017 reforms to NSW’s Motor Accident Injuries Act introduced significant changes to how insurers handle internal reviews of claim disputes. Previously, insurers could reject claims without providing detailed reasoning, but now claimants must first seek reconsideration through a formal internal process. This change ensures greater transparency and accountability in how insurers assess claims. For example, if an insurer denies a claim for soft-tissue injuries, the claimant must request a review before escalating the matter to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) or the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA). This shift places more responsibility on insurers to justify their decisions and allows claimants to challenge rejections with clearer procedural steps.
How Do NSW CTP Insurers Handle Disputes?
Under the revised framework, insurers must follow a structured process when reviewing disputed claims. First, the claimant must submit a written request for reconsideration, outlining why they believe the decision was incorrect. Insurers are required to respond within a specified timeframe, typically 28 days, and provide a detailed explanation of their reasoning. If the claimant remains unsatisfied, they can escalate the matter to the PIC or SIRA. This process ensures that claimants have a formal pathway to challenge decisions without immediately involving higher regulatory bodies.
The Role of SIRA in Post-2017 Internal Reviews
SIRA plays a critical regulatory role in overseeing how insurers conduct internal reviews. The authority has issued guidelines requiring insurers to document their review processes and ensure that decisions are based on the Motor Accident Guidelines. For instance, if an insurer disputes a claim for a threshold injury, SIRA expects the insurer to provide evidence that the injury does not meet the defined criteria. This increased scrutiny helps prevent arbitrary rejections and ensures that claimants receive fair treatment.
Practical Steps for Claimants in Bathurst and Other NSW Areas
If your insurer rejects your claim after an internal review, take the following steps:
- Request a detailed explanation of the rejection, including the specific reasons and evidence used.
- Gather supporting documentation, such as medical records, accident reports, and witness statements.
- Seek independent medical opinions if the insurer disputes the severity of your injury.
- Escalate to the PIC or SIRA if the internal review process is not followed correctly.
For example, a claimant in Bathurst who received a rejection for a soft-tissue injury might need to provide a medical report confirming the injury meets the threshold criteria. This evidence can be critical in persuading the insurer or regulatory body to reconsider their decision.
Time Limits and When to Seek Advice
NSW CTP claims have strict time limits. For instance, statutory benefits like weekly payments are generally limited to 52 weeks after an accident, unless the injury meets the threshold for long-term compensation. If your claim is rejected, act quickly: the 28-day internal review period is strict, and delays could jeopardize your ability to challenge the decision. If you’re unsure about your options, seek advice from a legal professional or a registered claims assistance service. Remember, the 2017 reforms do not guarantee a successful outcome, they simply provide a clearer pathway to challenge rejections.
Final Considerations
The 2017 reforms have made the internal review process more transparent but do not eliminate the need for careful preparation. Claimants must understand the evidence required to challenge a rejection and act within the prescribed timeframes. While the reforms have improved accountability, disputes often require expert legal or medical input to succeed. Every claim depends on its own facts, and the outcome will depend on the strength of your evidence and the insurer’s adherence to the new rules.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.