CRPS Claims After the 2017 CTP Reforms: What You Need to Know in NSW
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) following a road trauma is a complex condition that has changed significantly in how it is assessed and compensated under the New South Wales (NSW) Compulsory Third Party (CTP) scheme following the 2017 reforms. This article explains the key changes, how the New South Wales Motor Accidents Research Institute (SIRA) evaluates these claims, and what injured people need to know in the aftermath of a road accident.
What Changed in the 2017 CTP Reforms for CRPS Claims
Before the 2017 reforms, the assessment of CRPS claims under the old Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (MACA) was often inconsistent, with a lack of clear guidelines on how to determine the extent of a claimant’s injuries and the appropriate compensation. The introduction of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA) and the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 brought a more structured and uniform approach to assessing claims, including those involving CRPS.
Under the new framework, the focus has shifted from a purely subjective assessment of pain and suffering to a more objective evaluation based on clinical evidence and the Motor Accident Guidelines. This change has had a significant impact on how CRPS claims are processed, particularly in determining whether a claimant qualifies for long-term or lifetime benefits.
How SIRA Assesses CRPS Claims Under the Revised CTP Framework
SIRA, the official body responsible for administering the CTP scheme in NSW, now uses a more detailed and clinical approach to assess CRPS claims. The Motor Accident Guidelines provide a framework for determining the nature and severity of injuries, including CRPS, based on clinical signs and symptoms.
For a claimant to qualify for long-term benefits, SIRA typically requires evidence of a neurological injury, such as a spinal nerve-root injury, that results in neurological signs other than radiculopathy. In some cases, a diagnosis of CRPS may be considered a threshold injury, which may affect the availability of long-term benefits after 52 weeks.
SIRA also places a strong emphasis on the medical evidence, including the involvement of a medical practitioner who has assessed the claimant’s condition in accordance with the Motor Accident Guidelines. This ensures that the assessment of CRPS claims is based on clinical standards rather than subjective opinion.
Practical Steps and Evidence That Usually Matter
If you have been diagnosed with CRPS following a road trauma, there are several practical steps you can take to support your claim under the new CTP framework. First, it is important to seek a medical assessment from a qualified medical practitioner who is familiar with the Motor Accident Guidelines. This will help establish the nature and severity of your condition.
You should also keep a record of all medical records, including reports from your treating doctor, imaging results, and any other clinical evidence that supports your diagnosis of CRPS. In addition, you may need to provide evidence of how the condition has affected your daily life, such as difficulty with mobility, sleep disturbances, or emotional distress.
It is also important to notify the relevant insurer as soon as possible after the accident, as there are time limits for making a claim under the CTP scheme. While the exact time limits may vary depending on the circumstances of the accident, it is generally advisable to act quickly to ensure that your claim is processed in a timely manner.
Time Limits, Disputes and When to Seek Advice
Under the CTP scheme, there are strict time limits for making a claim, and these may vary depending on the type of claim and the circumstances of the accident. For example, claims for injuries that fall within the threshold injury category may be limited to a maximum of 52 weeks of weekly benefits, depending on the nature of the injury.
If your claim is disputed or rejected, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. A solicitor who specialises in CTP claims can help you understand your options and ensure that your claim is properly assessed under the new framework.
When to Seek Independent Legal Advice
While the CTP scheme provides a clear pathway for injured people in NSW, the process of making a claim can be complex, particularly when dealing with conditions like CRPS. In some cases, the assessment of a claim may depend on the interpretation of clinical evidence, the nature of the injury, and the circumstances of the accident.
If you are unsure whether your claim falls within the scope of the CTP scheme or if you believe that your claim has been unfairly assessed, it is important to seek independent legal advice. A solicitor who specialises in CTP claims can help you understand your options and ensure that your claim is properly assessed under the new framework.
Conclusion
The 2017 CTP reforms have significantly changed the way CRPS claims are assessed and compensated in NSW. While the new framework provides a more structured and objective approach to evaluating these claims, it also places a greater emphasis on the need for accurate and detailed medical evidence. If you have been diagnosed with CRPS following a road trauma, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible to ensure that your claim is properly assessed under the new framework.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.