Understanding the Role of Claims Assessors in NSW CTP Disputes
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
In New South Wales, claims assessors are responsible for reviewing and determining entitlements under the Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance scheme established by the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. When a dispute arises, such as a disagreement over the level of weekly income payments, treatment and care benefits, or the assessment of whole person impairment, the Public Interest Committee (PIC) may intervene to ensure decisions are made fairly and in accordance with the law. In Greater Sydney, as elsewhere in NSW, the PIC expects claims assessors to follow established guidelines and apply the law consistently.
The PIC does not make decisions itself but oversees the process to ensure that claims assessors act within their statutory authority. Assessors must base their determinations on medical evidence, the Motor Accident Injuries Regulations 2017, and the Motor Accident Injuries Guidelines issued by the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA). These documents define the standards for assessing injuries, calculating benefits, and handling disputes.
What the PIC Expects from Claims Assessors
The PIC expects claims assessors to act impartially, transparently, and in accordance with the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. Key expectations include:
- Ensuring all medical evidence is reviewed objectively and in line with the Motor Accident Injuries Guidelines.
- Applying the correct threshold injury criteria, including the distinction between radiculopathy and other spinal nerve-root injuries, as specified in the Guidelines.
- Notifying claimants of proposed decisions in writing and giving them a reasonable opportunity to respond.
- Documenting all decisions with clear reasoning, referencing the relevant sections of the Act and regulations.
- Avoiding delays in processing claims, particularly where a claimant is awaiting treatment or income support.
In Greater Sydney, where claim volumes are higher and medical services are more accessible, the PIC expects assessors to manage cases efficiently while maintaining accuracy. The PIC monitors performance through SIRA’s reporting framework, which tracks decision timeliness, consistency, and compliance with legal standards.
Practical Steps and Evidence That Matter in Disputes
When a dispute arises, the following evidence and actions are typically expected by the PIC and will influence the outcome:
- A complete medical record from the treating practitioner, including assessments of impairment, functional capacity, and treatment progress.
- A formal report from an independent medical practitioner if the claimant disputes the initial assessment.
- Evidence of income loss, including payslips, tax returns, or employer statements, if weekly payments are in question.
- Photographic evidence, accident scene diagrams, or witness statements, where the nature of the accident is disputed.
- Correspondence with the insurer, including any written responses to initial decisions.
Assessors must ensure that all evidence is properly considered and that claimants are given a fair opportunity to submit additional information. The PIC has previously highlighted that failure to consider relevant medical evidence or to allow a reasonable response period may result in a decision being set aside.
Time Limits, Disputes and the Path to Review
A claimant has 12 months from the date of the motor accident to make a claim for benefits under the CTP scheme. While this deadline does not apply to all aspects of a dispute, it is critical for initiating a claim. If a claimant disagrees with a decision made by a claims assessor, they may request an internal review from the insurer within 28 days of receiving the decision.
If the internal review does not resolve the dispute, the claimant may apply to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) for a review. The PIC will assess whether the original decision was made according to law and supported by evidence. The PIC does not substitute its own medical judgment but ensures that the assessor’s reasoning was sound and that the law was correctly applied.
The PIC’s review process is not a re-hearing of the medical evidence but a legal review of the decision-making process. A claimant may request a review within 12 months of the original decision, but delays may affect the outcome.
When to Seek Independent Advice
The PIC expects claims assessors to act within their authority and to follow established procedures. However, if a claimant believes a decision was made incorrectly, particularly where medical evidence is disputed or benefits are withheld without sufficient explanation, it may be appropriate to seek independent legal or medical advice.
A claimant should not assume that a dispute will result in a changed decision. The PIC’s role is to ensure procedural fairness and legal correctness, not to guarantee a favourable outcome. The review process may confirm the original decision, or it may require the insurer to reconsider based on new evidence or procedural error.
A Hypothetical Example: How the PIC’s Expectations Play Out
Consider a claimant in Sydney’s Inner West who was injured in a car park accident in July 2024. The claims assessor initially denied weekly income payments, citing insufficient evidence of income loss. The claimant provided tax returns and a letter from their employer confirming reduced hours. The insurer later revised the decision after the claimant submitted a medical report showing a 15% whole person impairment.
The PIC would expect the assessor to have considered the employer’s letter and tax documents at the outset. If the assessor failed to do so, the PIC might find the decision was not made in accordance with the law, even if the medical evidence was later accepted.
Next Steps: What You Should Do
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.