A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
Chronic pain claims under NSW Compulsory Third Party (CTP) laws require careful assessment of medical evidence and legal entitlements. If your claim is denied or disputed, understanding the available dispute resolution options is critical. This article explains how NSW CTP insurers evaluate chronic pain claims, outlines the formal process to challenge decisions, and details how to pursue a review through the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA). Time limits and procedural steps are also explained to help injured persons navigate long-term pain management disputes.
How NSW CTP Insurers Assess Chronic Pain Claims
NSW CTP insurers evaluate chronic pain claims based on medical evidence and the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. Chronic pain is typically considered a 'threshold injury' under the Motor Accident Guidelines, meaning it may qualify for statutory benefits like weekly income payments and treatment and care benefits. However, insurers must assess whether the pain is a direct consequence of the motor accident and not pre-existing or unrelated.
Key factors include: medical records documenting the injury's onset, a link between the accident and the chronic pain, and evidence of ongoing treatment. For example, if a pedestrian developed chronic back pain after a car collision, medical reports must show the pain began post-accident and is not due to a pre-existing condition. Insurers may also require a specialist report to confirm the injury's nature and impact.
Dispute Resolution Options for Chronic Pain Claims
If your claim is denied or you disagree with the assessment, you have formal options to challenge the decision. The first step is to request an internal review from the insurer. This allows them to reassess the claim based on new evidence or reconsider their interpretation of medical records. If the review outcome is unsatisfactory, you may escalate the matter to SIRA.
SIRA's dispute process involves submitting a written application for a review. The authority will then conduct an independent assessment of the claim, potentially requiring a medical expert to evaluate the injury.
Challenging Denied Chronic Pain Claims Through SIRA
To challenge a denied claim, you must first exhaust the insurer's internal review process. If you remain dissatisfied, you can apply to SIRA for a review within 28 days of the insurer's final decision. During the review, SIRA will consider:
- Whether the insurer correctly applied the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.
- Whether the medical evidence supports the claim.
- Whether the claimant's chronic pain meets the threshold injury criteria.
You must provide detailed evidence, including medical reports, accident records, and any correspondence with the insurer. SIRA may also request additional information or arrange for a medical assessment. While a successful challenge can lead to a revised decision, it is important to understand that SIRA's role is to review the process, not necessarily to overturn the insurer's initial assessment.
Practical Steps for Chronic Pain Claimants
- Document medical evidence: Ensure all medical records clearly link the chronic pain to the motor accident. This includes specialist reports, treatment records, and pain management plans.
- Preserve accident details: Keep records of the incident, such as police reports, witness statements, and photographs of the scene.
- Request internal review: Submit a written request to the insurer for a review of their decision, citing specific concerns or new evidence.
- Apply to SIRA: If the internal review is unsatisfactory, apply to SIRA within 28 days. Include all relevant documents and clearly state the grounds for your dispute.
- Seek independent medical opinion: If the insurer disputes the severity of your pain, consider obtaining a second opinion from a specialist familiar with CTP claims.
Time Limits and When to Seek Advice
NSW CTP claims have strict time limits. You must notify the insurer of your claim within 90 days of the accident. If you dispute the claim, you must apply to SIRA within 28 days of the insurer's final decision. Missing these deadlines can result in losing the right to challenge the claim. If you are unsure about your options or the timeline, it is advisable to seek legal advice promptly.
Example of a Chronic Pain Dispute
Consider a cyclist who suffered a fractured wrist in a car accident. Six months later, they developed chronic wrist pain requiring ongoing physiotherapy. The insurer denied the claim, arguing the pain was not a direct consequence of the fracture. The claimant submitted medical records showing the pain began after the accident and was linked to the fracture. After an internal review, the insurer upheld the denial, prompting the claimant to apply to SIRA. SIRA reviewed the evidence and confirmed the injury met the threshold criteria, leading to a revised decision.
Next Steps for Claimants
If you are facing a dispute over your chronic pain claim, it is essential to act quickly and methodically. Ensure all evidence is well-documented, follow the required time limits, and consider seeking independent medical or legal advice if needed. Remember, every claim depends on its own facts, and the outcome will hinge on the specific circumstances of your case.
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.
