Understanding CTP Claims When a Child Is Injured in NSW
A threshold injury under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) includes a soft tissue injury and a psychological or psychiatric injury that is not a recognised psychiatric illness (adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder are the usual examples; s 1.6 and Motor Accident Guidelines Part 5).
When a child is injured in a motor accident in New South Wales, the claim for compensation is governed by the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA). This law sets out the framework for compensation through the Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance scheme. The Personal Injury Claimant (PIC), typically a parent or guardian, may expect that the CTP insurer will cover reasonable and necessary treatment and care, weekly income payments if the child is a dependent, and, in some cases, damages for pain and suffering. However, disputes may arise over the extent of injury, the need for treatment, or the value of a claim, particularly in Greater Sydney where claim volumes are high and insurer practices may vary.
What the PIC Can Expect During a Dispute
In a dispute over a child injury claim, the PIC should expect that the insurer will assess the claim based on medical evidence, the nature of the injuries, and the provisions of the MAIA. The insurer may challenge the severity of the injury, the necessity of treatment, or the claim for damages. The PIC should not expect automatic approval of claims. Instead, they should anticipate a formal review process, which may include a request for further medical reports, a review by an independent medical practitioner, or a formal dispute resolution pathway through the Personal Injury Commission (PIC).
The PIC must be prepared to demonstrate that the child’s injuries are not merely minor or soft-tissue in nature, and that any claim for damages is supported by medical evidence showing a threshold injury. The insurer may also review whether the child’s injuries were caused by the accident, particularly if there was pre-existing medical history. The PIC should not assume that a child’s injury is automatically compensable simply because they were in a motor accident.
Key Evidence and Practical Steps
The most critical evidence in a child injury claim is medical documentation. This includes reports from the treating medical practitioner, diagnostic imaging (such as MRI or CT scans), and records of treatment received. For disputes, a detailed assessment of the child’s whole person impairment (WPI) by an independent medical assessor is often required. The PIC should preserve all records, including correspondence with the insurer, accident scene photos, and witness statements.
The PIC should also ensure that the claim is made within the time limits set by law. While the MAIA does not impose a fixed deadline for making a claim, delays may affect the insurer’s ability to investigate and may impact the outcome. The PIC should notify the insurer as soon as possible after the accident, and keep a record of all communications.
Dispute Resolution Pathways and Timelines
If a dispute arises, the PIC may request an internal review from the insurer. The insurer must respond within 28 days of receiving a formal dispute request. If the insurer upholds its original decision, the PIC may apply to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) for a review. The PIC must submit a formal application, including all supporting evidence, within 12 months of the insurer’s final decision.
The PIC should be aware that a review does not guarantee a change in outcome. The Commission will assess the claim based on the evidence and the law, including the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 and the Motor Accident Guidelines. The Commission may order a medical assessment, and the PIC must participate in this process. The timeline for a review can vary, but the Commission aims to finalise decisions within 120 days of receiving a complete application.
When to Seek Independent Advice
Given the complexity of assessing injury severity, WPI, and the legal standards for damages, the PIC should consider seeking independent legal advice if a dispute arises. This is particularly important in Greater Sydney, where claim volumes are high and insurer practices may be inconsistent. An experienced solicitor can help interpret medical evidence, assess the strength of the claim, and prepare a submission to the PIC.
A hypothetical example: A 10-year-old child was injured in a rear-end collision in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs. The child reported neck pain and headaches. The insurer initially accepted treatment but later refused a claim for damages, arguing the injury was not a threshold injury. The PIC sought a second medical opinion, which confirmed a spinal nerve-root injury with neurological signs. The PIC submitted this to the Commission, which accepted the evidence and ordered a WPI assessment. The claim was later settled for damages.
Next Steps for the PIC
Every claim depends on its own facts. To request contact about your circumstances, complete the quick, no obligation enquiry form.